Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2117 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - $70.0 vs $468.0
- Up to 84% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-9900K - $0.45 vs $2.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 55 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 10% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-3210 - 171 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 16 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
155
90.64327485380117%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349273 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.74/FPS
16.423357664233578%
Price, $
$468
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $468 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349274 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
30.515587529976017%
Multi-Core
1018
12.78894472361809%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |