Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3655 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $70.0 vs $567.98
- Up to 83% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i9-13900 - $0.57 vs $3.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 38% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-3210 - 170 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 32 vs 4 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
123
72.35294117647058%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349271 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
170
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.34/FPS
17.065868263473053%
Price, $
$567.98
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $567.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349272 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
18.75460574797347%
Multi-Core
1018
6.197491781322293%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |