Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1093 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - $79.0 vs $100.0
- Up to 15% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i3-6100 - $0.71 vs $0.84 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-3220 - 119 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i3-3220 - 51 vs 55 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
111
93.27731092436974%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349102 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
119
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
84.52380952380952%
Price, $
$100
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
43.969849246231156%
Multi-Core
1085
46.446917808219176%
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |