Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 1093 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - $79.0 vs $99.9
- Up to 16% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-6700T - $0.42 vs $0.5 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 4% better in Valheim than Core i3-3220 - 198 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3220 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 8 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
190
95.95959595959596%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349102 minutes ago
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
44.37869822485207%
Multi-Core
1085
30.426247896803137%
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |