Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100T outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100T is 1583 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 5% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-3220 - 163 vs 155 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i3-3220 - $66.82 vs $79.0
- Up to 20% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-3220 - $0.41 vs $0.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3220 - 35 vs 55 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280376 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
163
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$66.82
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $66.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280378 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |