Buy on Amazon
$79
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3220 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-750 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-750 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-3220 is 1091 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-750.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Performs up to 1% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-750 - 128 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-750 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-750 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-750
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i3-3220 - $75.0 vs $79.0
- Up to 5% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-3220 - $0.59 vs $0.62 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i3-3220 Processor (3M Cache, 3.30 GHz) BX80637i33220
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280400 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-750 Quad-Core Desktop Processor (BX80605I5750) 8M Cache, 2.66 GHz, LGA1156
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280400 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3220
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Core i5-750
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i5-750 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Lynnfield |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
