Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600 is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i5-10600 - $79.0 vs $299.95
- Up to 72% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i5-10600 - $0.72 vs $2.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 7% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i3-3220 - 118 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 12 vs 4 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
110
93.22033898305084%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349037 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
118
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.54/FPS
28.346456692913385%
Price, $
$299.95
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $299.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349038 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
33.24889170360988%
Multi-Core
1085
17.57085020242915%
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |