Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1366 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $79.0 vs $145.0
- Up to 41% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-6900K - $0.71 vs $1.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-3220 - 120 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 16 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348852 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
58.67768595041321%
Price, $
$145
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348853 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
41.93290734824281%
Multi-Core
1085
15.24304579938185%
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |