Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700 is 1583 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i7-7700 - $79.0 vs $167.0
- Up to 50% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-7700 - $0.62 vs $1.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-7700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Performs up to 5% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-3220 - 135 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 8 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
128
94.81481481481482%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348852 minutes ago
Buy for $167 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348853 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
37.79697624190065%
Multi-Core
1085
24.327354260089688%
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i7-7700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |