Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 2054 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 78% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - $41.0 vs $185.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 2700 - $0.24 vs $1.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-3240 - 181 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 16 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
170
93.92265193370166%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349040 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
23.52941176470588%
Price, $
$185
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349041 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
49.730700179533216%
Multi-Core
1137
20.714155583895064%
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |