Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9500 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9500 is 2237 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i5-9500 - $41.0 vs $160.74
- Up to 73% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-9500 - $0.22 vs $0.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-9500 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9500
- Performs up to 6% better in Valheim than Core i3-3240 - 202 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 6 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
190
94.05940594059405%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349043 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
202
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
27.499999999999996%
Price, $
$160.74
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $160.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349044 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
37.73841961852861%
Multi-Core
1137
22.78557114228457%
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | Intel Core i5-9500 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |