Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 7700 is 3785 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7700 - $41.0 vs $272.69
- Up to 81% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 7700 - $0.24 vs $1.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7700
- Performs up to 29% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-3240 - 219 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 16 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
170
77.6255707762557%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349155 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
219
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
19.2%
Price, $
$272.69
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $272.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
19.41135248773651%
Multi-Core
1137
7.678282009724473%
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |