Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 3116 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - $41.0 vs $240.0
- Up to 80% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-11900KF - $0.22 vs $1.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 14% better in Valheim than Core i3-3240 - 217 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 16 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
190
87.55760368663594%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349044 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
217
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
19.819819819819816%
Price, $
$240
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349045 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
23.910228744065602%
Multi-Core
1137
11.22962962962963%
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |