Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4690K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4690K is 637 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i5-4690K - $41.0 vs $53.5
- Up to 17% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-4690K - $0.15 vs $0.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690K - 55 vs 88 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Performs up to 6% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-3240 - 291 vs 275 FPS
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
275
94.50171821305841%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349628 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
291
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
83.33333333333334%
Price, $
$53.5
76%
FPS Winner
Buy for $53.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349629 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
43.04584304584304%
Multi-Core
1137
31.31368768934178%
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | Intel Core i5-4690K |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 88 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |