Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400T outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7400T is 1583 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i5-7400T - $41.0 vs $63.5
- Up to 29% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i5-7400T - $0.2 vs $0.28 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-3240 - 226 vs 210 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
210
92.92035398230088%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349626 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
226
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
71.42857142857143%
Price, $
$63.5
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for $63.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349627 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
54.473942969518184%
Multi-Core
1137
40.52031361368496%
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |