Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1366 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $41.0 vs $145.0
- Up to 68% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i7-6900K - $0.33 vs $1.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 12% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-3240 - 139 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 16 vs 4 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
124
89.20863309352518%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349043 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
139
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
31.73076923076923%
Price, $
$145
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349044 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
44.24920127795527%
Multi-Core
1137
15.973588086541163%
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |