Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Core i3-4000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3417 days newer than Core i3-4000M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4000M
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 37 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 17% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-4000M - 138 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4000M - 32 vs 4 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-4000M
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2013
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4000M | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
