Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1439 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 84% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $43.0 vs $270.0
- Up to 84% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $0.33 vs $2.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 3% better in Far Cry 3 than Core i3-4130 - 135 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 24 vs 4 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
131
97.03703703703704%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349513 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2/FPS
16.5%
Price, $
$270
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349513 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
995
84.75298126064736%
Multi-Core
1960
28.09633027522936%
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |