Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4130 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-750 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4130 is 1454 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-750.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-750 - 179 vs 167 FPS
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i5-750 - $43.0 vs $75.0
- Up to 47% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-750 - $0.24 vs $0.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-750 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-750 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
179
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349403 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
167
93.29608938547486%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
53.333333333333336%
Price, $
$75
57%
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349402 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Single-Core
427
42.91457286432161%
Multi-Core
1200
61.224489795918366%
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | Intel Core i5-750 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |