Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 1874 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $43.0 vs $595.0
- Up to 92% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-9920X - $0.19 vs $2.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 54 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-4130 - 240 vs 225 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 24 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
225
93.75%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349703 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
240
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.48/FPS
7.661290322580645%
Price, $
$595
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for $595 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349702 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
995
70.41755130927105%
Multi-Core
1960
20.758313916543106%
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | Intel Core i9-9920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |