Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1858 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $43.0 vs $530.0
- Up to 91% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.83 vs $9.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 8% better in Starfield than Core i3-4130 - 56 vs 52 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 24 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
52
92.85714285714286%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349580 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
56
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.46/FPS
8.773784355179703%
Price, $
$530
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for $530 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349579 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
995
78.10047095761381%
Multi-Core
1960
26.294606922457742%
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |