Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4150 is 605 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-3240 - 155 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 54 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i3-4150 - $41.0 vs $48.0
- Up to 13% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-4150 - $0.27 vs $0.31 per FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280580 minutes ago
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280579 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |