Buy on Amazon
$48
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $117
Availability
MSRP in USD: $117
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4150 outperforms the more expensive Pentium G3258 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4150 is 32 days older than the more expensive Pentium G3258.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 11% better in Rust than Pentium G3258 - 179 vs 161 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than Pentium G3258 - $48.0 vs $51.36
- Up to 16% better value when playing Rust than Pentium G3258 - $0.27 vs $0.32 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3258 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Core i3-4150 - 53 vs 54 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-4150
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
179
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-4150 Processor (3M Cache, 3.50 GHz) BX80646I34150
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280578 minutes ago
Intel G3258 4 Pentium 3.20 GHz 3M Cache 2 Core Processor (BX80646G3258)
Buy for $51.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280576 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-4150
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Pentium G3258 |
|---|---|---|
| May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Pentium |
| Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 54 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
