Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 1713 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - $48.0 vs $359.0
- Up to 86% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-9900KF - $0.3 vs $2.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-4150 - 172 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 16 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
162
94.18604651162791%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349409 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
172
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.09/FPS
14.354066985645932%
Price, $
$359
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $359 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349408 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1041
61.5612063867534%
Multi-Core
2047
25.419098472618902%
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |