Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $48.0 vs $283.35
- Up to 74% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-10900KF - $1.17 vs $4.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 54% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-4150 - 63 vs 41 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 20 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
41
65.07936507936508%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349155 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
63
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.5/FPS
26%
Price, $
$283.35
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $283.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1041
59.04707884288145%
Multi-Core
2047
22.36180904522613%
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |