Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1420 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 12% better in Need For Speed Unbound than FX-8120 - 137 vs 122 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - $78.02 vs $100.0
- Up to 12% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-6100 - $0.64 vs $0.73 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
87.67123287671234%
Price, $
$100
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349275 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
122
89.05109489051095%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349274 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |