Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 490 days older than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-7400T - 164 vs 162 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - $63.5 vs $100.0
- Up to 36% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-6100 - $0.39 vs $0.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-6100 - 35 vs 51 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
63.934426229508205%
Price, $
$100
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349275 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
162
98.78048780487805%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349275 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |