Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 2583 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $100.0 vs $899.99
- Up to 75% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 9 7950X - $2.22 vs $8.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 51 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 124% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-6100 - 101 vs 45 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
45
44.554455445544555%
Value, $/FPS
$2.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349274 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
101
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.91/FPS
24.91582491582492%
Price, $
$899.99
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349274 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1194
40.639891082368955%
Multi-Core
2336
12.108018452288395%
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |