Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-6100 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-6100 is 709 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $100.0 vs $788.88
- Up to 87% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $2.22 vs $17.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349156 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
45
100%
Value, $/FPS
$17.53/FPS
12.66400456360525%
Price, $
$788.88
12%
Buy for $788.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
98.07370184254607%
Multi-Core
7539
100%
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |