Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 488 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-4150 - 183 vs 180 FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Core i3-4150 - 51 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - $48.0 vs $100.0
- Up to 51% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-6100 - $0.27 vs $0.55 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
183
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
49.09090909090909%
Price, $
$100
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349404 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
180
98.36065573770492%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349404 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1041
87.1859296482412%
Multi-Core
2047
87.62842465753424%
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |