Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 781 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 49% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $48.0 vs $94.05
- Up to 48% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $0.38 vs $0.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 2% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-4150 - 128 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 12 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
126
98.4375%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349388 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
52.054794520547944%
Price, $
$94.05
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for $94.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349388 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1041
88.22033898305085%
Multi-Core
2047
37.35401459854015%
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Haswell | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |