Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $100.0 vs $160.68
- Up to 32% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-11600KF - $0.84 vs $1.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-6100 - 130 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
119
91.53846153846153%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348795 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.24/FPS
67.74193548387096%
Price, $
$160.68
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for $160.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348794 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1194
54.37158469945356%
Multi-Core
2336
26.82898817043758%
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |