Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-6100 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1405 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 2% better in War Thunder than Ryzen 5 3400G - 167 vs 164 FPS
- Up to 24% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3400G - $100.0 vs $132.0
- Up to 25% better value when playing War Thunder than Ryzen 5 3400G - $0.6 vs $0.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 8 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348918 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
164
98.20359281437125%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
74.99999999999999%
Price, $
$132
75%
Buy for $132 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348918 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |