Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $66.82 vs $160.68
- Up to 54% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-11600KF - $0.57 vs $1.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 10% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-7100T - 130 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 12 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
118
90.76923076923077%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$66.82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $66.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348793 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.24/FPS
45.96774193548387%
Price, $
$160.68
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $160.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348792 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1116
50.81967213114754%
Multi-Core
2260
25.956127253933616%
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |