Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100T outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100T is 1533 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 4% better in Valheim than FX-8350 - 197 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 64% cheaper than FX-8350 - $66.82 vs $185.0
- Up to 65% better value when playing Valheim than FX-8350 - $0.34 vs $0.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
197
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$66.82
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $66.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348902 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
190
96.44670050761421%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
35.05154639175258%
Price, $
$185
36%
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348901 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |