Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $66.82 vs $225.99
- Up to 69% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-10700F - $0.57 vs $1.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-7100T - 124 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 16 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
118
95.16129032258065%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$66.82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $66.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348795 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.82/FPS
31.318681318681314%
Price, $
$225.99
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348795 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1116
69.23076923076923%
Multi-Core
2260
31.254321670584982%
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |