Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $225.99 vs $265.0
- Up to 4% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-11900K - $2.04 vs $2.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 13% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-10700F - 125 vs 111 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
111
88.8%
Value, $/FPS
$2.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353908 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.12/FPS
96.22641509433963%
Price, $
$265
85%
FPS Winner
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353908 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1612
67.98819063686207%
Multi-Core
7231
66.04859335038363%
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |