Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 1827 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - $66.82 vs $458.0
- Up to 71% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-12900 - $1.55 vs $5.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 100% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-7100T - 86 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 24 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
43
50%
Value, $/FPS
$1.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$66.82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $66.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349042 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
86
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.33/FPS
29.080675422138835%
Price, $
$458
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $458 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349041 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1116
45.12737565709664%
Multi-Core
2260
17.32597362772156%
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Core i9-12900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |