Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 1281 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $66.82 vs $450.0
- Up to 84% better value when playing Valheim than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $0.34 vs $2.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 5% better in Valheim than Core i3-7100T - 206 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 24 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
197
95.63106796116504%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$66.82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $66.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349036 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
206
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.18/FPS
15.59633027522936%
Price, $
$450
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $450 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349035 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1116
64.54598033545402%
Multi-Core
2260
22.532402791625124%
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |