Buy on Amazon
$110
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $117
Availability
MSRP in USD: $117
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-8100 outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-8100 is 1577 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 5% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than FX-9590 - 115 vs 110 FPS
- Up to 63% cheaper than FX-9590 - $110.0 vs $298.02
- Up to 65% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than FX-9590 - $0.96 vs $2.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-8100
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
115
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.96/FPS
100%
Price, $
$110
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-8100 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 3.6 GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA1151 300 Series 95W
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348802 minutes ago
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
110
95.65217391304348%
Value, $/FPS
$2.71/FPS
35.42435424354243%
Price, $
$298.02
36%
AMD FD9590FHHKWOF FX-9590 8-core 4.7 GHz Socket AM3+ 220W Black Edition Desktop Processor
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348801 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-8100
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
