Buy on Amazon
$110
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $117
Availability
MSRP in USD: $117
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $399
Availability
MSRP in USD: $399
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 1006 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3800XT - $110.0 vs $406.45
- Up to 72% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 7 3800XT - $0.92 vs $3.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 4% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-8100 - 125 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel Core i3-8100 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 3.6 GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA1151 300 Series 95W
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348793 minutes ago
Ryzen 7 3800XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.25/FPS
28.30769230769231%
Price, $
$406.45
27%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT 8-core, 16-Threads Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for $406.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348792 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-8100
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Ryzen 7 3800XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-8100
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Single-Core
1245
70.81911262798634%
Multi-Core
3405
40.148567385921474%
Intel Core i3-8100 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
