Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-8100 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-8100 is 2461 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-2500K - 120 vs 113 FPS
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i5-2500K - $110.0 vs $390.81
- Up to 73% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-2500K - $0.92 vs $3.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$110
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348916 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
113
94.16666666666667%
Value, $/FPS
$3.46/FPS
26.589595375722546%
Price, $
$390.81
28%
Buy for $390.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348915 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
646
51.88755020080321%
Multi-Core
1921
56.41703377386197%
Intel Core i3-8100 | vs | Intel Core i5-2500K |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |