Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 1818 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $110.0 vs $593.77
- Up to 79% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-13600KF - $0.92 vs $4.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 14% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-8100 - 137 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 20 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
120
87.59124087591242%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$110
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349043 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.33/FPS
21.247113163972287%
Price, $
$593.77
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $593.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349042 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Single-Core
1245
45.32216963960685%
Multi-Core
3405
22.08887447291599%
Intel Core i3-8100 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |