Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-8100 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-8100 is 363 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $110.0 vs $530.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing Valheim than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.55 vs $2.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 24 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348912 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.66/FPS
20.67669172932331%
Price, $
$530
20%
Buy for $530 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348912 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Single-Core
1245
97.72370486656202%
Multi-Core
3405
45.68017171988194%
Intel Core i3-8100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |