Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-6400 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-8100T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-6400 is 1005 days older than the more expensive Core i3-8100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-6400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-8100T - 126 vs 125 FPS
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i3-8100T - $99.95 vs $178.02
- Up to 44% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-8100T - $0.79 vs $1.42 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
125
99.20634920634922%
Value, $/FPS
$1.42/FPS
55.633802816901415%
Price, $
$178.02
56%
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360890 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
126
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360890 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100T | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |