Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100T outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8100T is 1799 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Performs up to 6% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-6350 - 337 vs 319 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i3-8100T - $100.0 vs $178.02
- Up to 42% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i3-8100T - $0.31 vs $0.53 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 6 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
337
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
58.490566037735846%
Price, $
$178.02
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360521 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
319
94.65875370919882%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360520 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100T | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |