Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-8400 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-8100T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-8400 is 179 days older than the more expensive Core i3-8100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-8400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 12% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-8100T - 357 vs 319 FPS
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i3-8100T - $140.0 vs $178.02
- Up to 30% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-8100T - $0.39 vs $0.56 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 6 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
319
89.35574229691878%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
69.64285714285714%
Price, $
$178.02
78%
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359797 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
357
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$140
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359797 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1073
79.30524759793053%
Multi-Core
3027
63.753159224936816%
Intel Core i3-8100T | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |