Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the more expensive Core i5-8400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 35 days older than the more expensive Core i5-8400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 0% better in Apex Legends than Core i5-8400 - 278 vs 277 FPS
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i5-8400 - $109.99 vs $140.0
- Up to 22% better value when playing Apex Legends than Core i5-8400 - $0.32 vs $0.41 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 16 vs 6 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
277
99.64028776978418%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
78.04878048780488%
Price, $
$140
78%
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353912 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
278
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353912 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
86.32668144863267%
Multi-Core
5794
100%
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |