Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100 outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100 is 1908 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than FX-9590 - 121 vs 112 FPS
- Up to 51% cheaper than FX-9590 - $145.0 vs $298.02
- Up to 55% better value when playing Elden Ring than FX-9590 - $1.2 vs $2.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
121
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$145
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348795 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
112
92.56198347107438%
Value, $/FPS
$2.66/FPS
45.11278195488722%
Price, $
$298.02
48%
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348794 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |