Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100T outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100T is 135 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Performs up to 2% better in Dirt 5 than Ryzen 7 2700 - 172 vs 168 FPS
- Up to 46% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - $99.0 vs $185.0
- Up to 47% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Ryzen 7 2700 - $0.58 vs $1.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 16 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
172
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348550 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
168
97.67441860465115%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
52.72727272727272%
Price, $
$185
53%
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348551 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |